In light of frequent mass shootings, should the US ban all automatic weapons?
Agree
+-
Having military style weapons in the hands of normal people was not the intention of the founding fathers when writing the Second Amendment
+-
The text literally mentions militias. Other founders mentioned the necessity of the people controlling the military. See also the standing armies clause. Of course military style weapons were their intention.
Disagree
+-
Suppose, for a moment, that you are being attacked by a group of people, which isn't outside of the realm of impossibility. Remember when people protested and destroyed everything some time ago? There were even individuals who were attacked by groups. So, absolutely not. ANYONE should be able to bear such type of arms.
+-
If you get attacked by a group of people then a handgun will do the trick. You don’t have to be able to spray 20 bullets per second to get rid of some guys attacking you. Also, what if somebody who is insane buys an automatic gun. What harm could they do if they attacked a school or any large assembly. Hell sane people buy guns and shoot up schools, if everyone should be able to bear these kinds of weapons what is stopping them from using them to kill innocent people. Take it from me.
- your friendly neighborhood war criminal
+-
fully automatic weapons have been banned since the late 1980s, and its handguns primarily used in all types of shootings.